Himal Press 
KATHMANDU: Internal dissent is growing within the CPN-UML following the party leadership’s acceptance of a land donation from controversial businessman Min Bahadur Gurung, founder of Bhat-Bhateni Supermarket, for the party’s central office building.
Chairperson KP Sharma Oli’s decision to accept a land plot valued at about Rs 1 billion from the controversial businessperson has sparked criticism within the party with some senior leaders expressing concern over potential conflicts of interest.
Social media users have labeled the donation as a bribe to settle the Lalita Niwas land scam, in which Gurung is implicated.
One senior UML leader told Himal Press that the party’s decision to seek higher ground to avoid flooding issues at the existing party office in Chyasal, Lalitpur, could expose the party to greater risks. The leader added that Oli’s decision, which was taken without sufficient internal debate, has hurt the sentiments of dedicated party workers and 2.8 million voters.
Although Gurung is known for his philanthropic works, many party members say this is not merely a philanthropic gesture. They believe an undisclosed deal has been struck with the controversial businessperson.
UML leader Binda Pandey publicly opposed the decision on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter). “25 years ago, everyone who participated in the campaign by donating one day’s wages for the Manmohan Workers Building still feels proud when they visit the GEFONT office today. Now, with half a million party members and being the largest party based on votes, have we reached a point where the leadership can feel proud about receiving the construction site for the party office as a donation?” she questioned.
Kumar Panta, former president of the Non-Resident Nepali Association and considered close to the UML, said accepting financial aid from a controversial businessperson for the party office building construction is “extremely worrying” and risks eroding public trust in political parties.
Panta added that such actions not only tarnish the party’s image but also negatively impact the morale of party workers. “People are seeking transparency and honesty from political parties today. Leadership needs to act considering public concerns and needs,” he said.
